I had a recent twitter conversation with Chris Keal, the technology editor from the NBR.co.nz
In essence, NBR put out a story about how Season 4 of the Game of thrones being released by HBO was being geo-restricted by being distributed through even less channels. Whereas last year it was availble in iTunes Australia, this year it wouldn’t be until the local distributor had aired all the episodes.
This artical was originally available free. Then Chris tweeted that the story had now been moved behind the paywall, ie NBR had restricted access to the content.
@ChrisKeall is that irony or what?
Apparently not according to Chris,
@paulq Nope. Anyone from anywhere can choose to subscribe to NBR Online. HBO is restricting GoT online access by geography
he seems to think that because the NBR is available to all, there are no paralells here. Lance Wiggs agreed –
I agree with Chris – it’s about access, not about cost.
I say they’re wrong, cost is just another barrier
So lets look at why i think its ironic
Irony is defined as meaning
“dissimulation, feigned ignorance”), in its broadest sense, is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or event characterized by an incongruity, or contrast, between what the expectations of a situation are and what is really the case, with a third element, that defines that what is really the case is ironic because of the situation that led to it.
- a story about content being less available gets moved from free to paywalled ie less available = incongruity
- the situation that led to this incongruity – a story about content restrictions get restricted.
Sure looks like irony to me.
But more important to me, was the whole argument. The use of semantics to defend the position of one arm of the media is really enlightening. Its enlightening because we all do it – deliberately or through cognitive bias.
In this instance its ok to place restrictions on content because it ” is sharper than ad funded” ( as an aside – what the hell does that mean?)
As a consumer of both content types, i can tell you with absolute surity, all i see is restrictions. The semantics of the situation and the whys and wherefores and rationalisation don’t mean
much anything to me.
Its a great lesson, i’ve caught myself doing just this sort of thing. You get lost in the technology, old business model or the absolute belief that you’ve got it right or the product is prefect… and you loose sight of the most imporant thing…how the end customer views it.