<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The internet, the great business facilitator.</title>
		<description>Comments for The internet, the great business facilitator. at http://unreasonablemen.net , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://unreasonablemen.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:30:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://unreasonablemen.net/index.php/Blogs/The-internet-the-great-business-facilitator.html#comment-199</link>
			<description>That's devaluation not some evil grin - Jim Donovan</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:57:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://unreasonablemen.net/index.php/Blogs/The-internet-the-great-business-facilitator.html#comment-198</link>
			<description> “Devaluation” is a strange way of describing what has happened. While in one economic meaning he may be right, ie. the unit price has come down, the value of a good or service to a customer (ie. its utility or benefits) doesn’t decrease when it is delivered via the internet.  On the contrary, its value may well have increased, through greater convenience, speed, and so on.  Or it may have become more affordable and accessible to new customers.  Likewise for a supplier.  I’ve never met someone in business who thought that increasing efficiency, effectiveness, customer utility or market reach for lower cost doesn’t enhance or at least maintain shareholder value. While unit revenue may come down, competitiveness may have been enhanced.

Lean manufacturing created much greater value for customers and shareholders (or at least those whose companies who adopted it).  The lean business processes made possible by the internet do the same. - Jim Donovan</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:08:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
